The Problem: Bluebirds and Tree Swallows may compete for nest boxes.
For over 40 years the North American public has been led to believe that bluebirds are
in trouble, their very survival in danger unless humans come to their rescue.  But this
wasn't true 40 years ago and isn't true now.  In fact you may be surprised to learn that:
  • No bluebird species is or has ever been classified endangered or threatened.
    Instead, ornithologists rate all three bluebirds species of "least concern.”
  • Eastern Bluebirds are the third most numerous of the more than 60 species of
    native North American cavity-nesting land birds.
Unfortunately, continued public belief that bluebirds need to be rescued has caused
serious problems for Tree Swallows and those of us who enjoy them.  Please read on.

There are three species of bluebirds, the Eastern, Western and Mountain.  Like Tree
Swallows, bluebirds depend on cavities for nesting but are unable to make their own.
And although Tree Swallows are significantly smaller than bluebirds in every external
body dimension but wing length, and are outweighed by bluebirds 30 grams to 20,where
their ranges overlap swallows will actively compete with bluebirds for cavities, as Pat
Grantham's photo below of Western Bluebirds and a Tree Swallow contesting a box in
Montana dramatically illustrates.



















In recent years there has been a popular and highly publicized movement to erect nest
boxes for bluebirds.  Many people are devoted to "bringing the bluebird back" to
supposed former levels of abundance, an impossible task, based on misconceptions and
myths, as we shall see.  Some bluebird lovers become irritated when their boxes are
occupied by other species, especially Tree Swallows.  Bluebird enthusiasts have been
heard to complain, "Tree Swallows took all my bluebird boxes!  They ganged up and
drove my bluebirds away!"  

Are these complaints justified?  You may meet people, especially in Eastern Bluebird
range, who tell you that encouraging Tree Swallows is wrong.  It is not.  Bluebirds and
Tree Swallows are both native songbirds,
equally worthy of care, consideration, and
conservation, and Tree Swallows aren't preventing bluebirds from becoming abundant.  
One species is not more "desirable" than the other.  But unfortunately there is still
resentment in some quarters when Tree Swallows compete for bluebird boxes, and a
minority, hopefully very small, of bluebird hobbyists feels free to destroy swallow nests
and eggs they discover in their boxes.  This is both sad and unnecessary, to say nothing
of immoral and illegal, since there are accepted management techniques that can
reduce most strife between the species.  In the photo below a male Eastern Bluebird
defends its box against a Tree Swallow.



















Spacing nest boxes for bluebirds:
Much competition between Tree Swallows and bluebirds would be eliminated if bluebird
hobbyists simply followed accepted box spacing guidelines.  Since bluebirds defend
large feeding territories around their nests they don't want to nest close to other
bluebirds.  
Experts recommend that bluebird boxes should be spaced at least 300'
apart (the length of a football field), preferably even farther.
 

In contrast, unlike bluebirds, Tree Swallows do not defend feeding territories, just a
small area around their nest.  For this reason the recommended spacing for swallow
boxes is only 100' apart.
 This means many pairs of swallows can potentially nest within
an area that just one pair of bluebirds would normally need to claim.   

When bluebird boxes are spaced far apart the way they should be, a pair of bluebirds
usually contends with just one pair of Tree Swallows, and in these contests the larger,
stronger bluebirds normally win.  
It's a myth that bluebirds are "gentler" and "less
aggressive" than Tree Swallows
.  Bluebirds are very capable of intense, prolonged and
sometimes lethal aggressive behavior
; their behavior patterns just differ from the
swallows'.  Swallows rely on screaming, persistent approaches, dive-bombing, and pecks
given on the fly-by.  A bluebird's usual tactic is to wait at the box, making occasional
hostile displays, then dashing out to intercept the swallow, grappling with it and
tumbling with it to the ground where the bluebird can peck the swallow and beat it
with its wings.  In the photo below by Jackie Sills of Alberta a female Mountain Bluebird
has pinned down a Tree Swallow and is striking it.


























One pair of bluebirds is normally more than a match for one pair of swallows, but
problems can arise when bluebird boxes are spaced closer than 300'.  Clusters of boxes
in one bluebird territory may attract groups of swallows that can mob the lone pair of
bluebirds.  However, even then truly fit bluebirds often win out.  The proof?  Bluebirds
commonly secure and defend boxes, and nest successfully within grids of 50-100 or more
active Tree Swallow nests at ornithology research sites.  Here in New York bluebirds
have raised broods in three of our five swallow projects over the years.  Our experience
is that
if bluebirds really want a box they are very capable of taking and defending it
from swallows
.  The photo below, showing a Tree Swallow being dragged from a box by
a female Eastern Bluebird, was taken by Jim Gilbert in New Jersey.  Note the species
size difference.

















The Solution: Reduce bluebird-swallow competition by Pairing Boxes.
It is impossible to design a swallow-proof bluebird box because swallows are so much
smaller and slimmer than bluebirds.  
However, there is one proven technique that
allows both songbirds to nest
together successfully.  This is "pairing;" setting up pairs
of boxes, with each box of a pair no more than 5-10 feet apart.
 Since Tree Swallows
seldom allow another pair of swallows to nest within 10 feet, the second box is usually
free for bluebird use and the two species can co-exist, after some initial squabbling to
sort out who gets which box.   Photo below by Andrew Aldrich.


















Swallows and bluebirds will even nest in boxes mounted back to back on a single pole as
the pictures below, taken at the ABC Bluebird Trail in Albion, NY, illustrate.  


























Click
HERE to view a YouTube video of Eastern Bluebirds and Tree Swallows bringing
food to their broods at another pair of boxes, and
HERE to see inside the boxes.

Does pairing boxes always work?  No, of course not.  But it is effective often enough
that it should be tried when bluebird vs. swallow competition is a concern.

Remember that if you use pairing to reduce competition between bluebirds and
swallows, bluebird spacing requirements still apply
.  Each pair of boxes should still be
300' or more from the next pair or the purpose of pairing is defeated.





The example below, at a New York nature center, with one pair of boxes in front and a
second pair just a short distance behind, shows what
not to do.  















The moral is that people who manage for Tree Swallows and bluebirds need not be at
odds.  Bluebirders rightly take pride in how they've increased bluebird numbers
dramatically, and most also realize it's not a tragedy if other native species occupy some
of their boxes.  They view these situations objectively as opportunities to enjoy
another species and to learn their ways.  They've come to value the diversity found
among birds.

But aren't bluebirds in trouble?  Don't they deserve special treatment?
No, they aren't and they don't!  Despite what you may have heard or read there is
nothing unique or inherent about bluebirds that warrants special treatment or
favoritism
, and certainly not at the expense of other native species.  Contrary to
popular belief
not one of the three bluebird species is endangered or threatened now,
and none has been at any time in its recent history.  No bluebird species is in peril;
none need to be rescued
.  

In 2008 the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN)
rated
all three bluebirds species of "Least Concern."  A 2012 update to Partners In
Flight's Species Assessment Database, which uses peer-reviewed scientific
methodology, estimated there were
22,000,000 Eastern Bluebirds, 4,600,000
Mountain Bluebirds
, and 6,700,000 Western Bluebirds in North America, for a total of
33,300,000 bluebirds
.  By contrast Tree Swallows numbered 17,000,000.  That's right,
there are more Eastern Bluebirds in this world than Tree Swallows.
 Most people
today are very surprised to learn that, according to the PIF Database,
of the 60 plus
species of native Canadian and American landbirds that nest exclusively or almost
exclusively in cavities, Eastern Bluebirds are the third most abundant;
only House
Wrens and Black-capped Chickadees are more numerous.

On another measure, the Continental Concern Score, Partners in Flight assigned Eastern
Bluebirds a score of 7 on a scale of 4-20, where higher numbers signify species with
greater potential for future vulnerability.  Other species receiving a 7 were Yellow
Warbler, Chipping Sparrow, Brown-headed Cowbird, and European Starling.  Tree
Swallow received an 8, along with other familiar cavity-nesting birds such as Tufted
Titmouse, Carolina Wren, and Purple Martin.  In other words
the outlook for Eastern
Bluebirds is considered somewhat better than that for Tree Swallows.  

What problems do Tree Swallows face?  
Tree Swallows are losing natural nesting habitat as northern forests are cut for
pulpwood and lumber, and lost to large-scale mining.  Perhaps more importantly they
are losing crucial migration and wintering habitat as the coastal wetlands they depend
on in the U.S., Mexico, and Central America are degraded, drained, or converted by
humans for use in aquaculture, agriculture, industry, and housing, or lost to rising sea
levels caused by global warming.  In fact, in 2011 Birds of North America reported
significant declines since 1980 in the Tree Swallow breeding populations of Canada, New
England, and the Great Lakes states.  Even more recently, Audubon's 2014 "
Birds and
Climate Change Report" has called the Tree Swallow "Climate Threatened", one of 188
North American species which are "expected to lose more than 50 percent of their
current range by 2080 if global warming continues at its current pace."  (Western and
Mountain Bluebirds are also considered "Climate Threatened", but the Eastern Bluebird
is not.)  Audubon's scientists predict that Tree Swallow summer and winter ranges will
be forced to shift northward, and that successful utilization of more northerly breeding
areas will require growth of forests where there are none now and/or addition of nest
boxes.  

The rise, fall, and rise of the Eastern Bluebird:
Many bird enthusiasts are becoming aware there are hundreds of species of plants and
animals in North America, including many birds, that are in much worse shape than
either bluebirds or Tree Swallows, and deserve our aid too.  With this in mind perhaps
some of the bluebird hobbyists' goals for bluebird "recovery" or "restoration" should be
reconsidered.  At this point a bit of historical perspective might help.












Before its dramatic alteration by humans most of North America east of the Great Plains
was dense forest.  Since Eastern Bluebirds prefer open and semi-open areas with
scattered woody vegetation, they were probably restricted to areas burned over by
forest fires and in early stages of regeneration.  Burns would have dead trees with
cavities, perches for hawking down on insects, and fruit-bearing shrubs typical of early
plant succession.  However, as burns returned to forest, bluebirds would have needed
to relocate.  In any given year most of the eastern forest would have been unsuitable
habitat for them. Therefore,
under natural, pre-human conditions Eastern Bluebirds
were never likely to have been common breeding birds except perhaps locally on
burns, and they were certainly never the abundant species that some hobbyist
literature and web sites would have you believe
.  

Then, Native Americans arrived.  The clearings they created for farms and villages
increased bluebird habitat, at the expense of woodland bird species.  Fires Native
Americans set to create and maintain feeding openings for deer, elk, and bison would
also have benefited bluebirds by thinning undergrowth.  

But it was when North America was colonized by Europeans that the forests began to
be cleared in earnest.  By the mid 1800's the eastern forests were almost gone, replaced
by small farms with cropland, pastures and orchards.  It's hard to appreciate how
completely deforested the land was unless you see photos from the time.  Though this
was devastating for woodland wildlife, it was a bonanza for bluebirds!  The small farms
of 19th century rural North America offered vast areas of new and absolutely perfect
habitat.  Bluebirds were able to occupy wide areas where they had never lived before
and their numbers skyrocketed.

But then things changed once again.  In 1851 House Sparrows were introduced from
Europe, followed in 1890 by European Starlings.  As these aggressive non-native cavity
nesters multiplied they out-competed bluebirds for many nest sites.  The small farm,
once so inviting, also changed.  Marginal, unprofitable farms were abandoned and began
the slow but inevitable return to forest.  On better farms mechanized equipment
replaced horses and mules, and allowed small fields to be combined into large.  
Automobiles meant pasturage was not needed for horse-drawn vehicles.  "Clean
orchards" and dwarf varieties of fruit trees became the rule.  Suitable cavities and
habitat for bluebirds became scarce.  Then in the 1900's indiscriminate application of
chemical pesticides became common, poisoning bluebird food and bluebirds that ate it.  
Bluebird numbers plummeted.  Luckily, by the 1930's and 1940's observant people began
to realize they had become scarce relative to the golden days of the 1800's, and started
the movement to "bring back the bluebirds."

Since then
bluebird nest box programs have been very successful, and the mowing of
lawns, parks, and cemeteries has created vast new areas of short-grass habitat
that
bluebirds have been quick to utilize.  More responsible use of pesticides has certainly
helped.  Supplemental feeding now aids bluebird survival during cold snaps.  And
although it can't be proven, competition with House Sparrows and Starlings may be
selecting for bluebirds that are genetically rougher and tougher. Let's hope it's true.  
Whatever the reasons, Eastern Bluebirds are common nesters again across much of
eastern and central North America, and have actually been able to invade large areas of
Canada and the American west where they had not bred historically.  
In fact it's very
possible Eastern Bluebirds are
more abundant now than when humans first reached
their range.  














However, to expect Eastern Bluebird numbers could ever return to the extreme highs
of the 1800's is unrealistic
.  House Sparrows and Starlings are here to stay.  Forests
have returned in many places, although a mere shadow of their former size.  And the
small farm of yesteryear will not return.  A couple hundred million more people with
houses, cars, highways, and buildings now occupy bluebird habitat of the 1800's.  The
clock cannot be turned back.  The Eastern Bluebird cannot reattain the abnormally high
numbers of the 1800's.  Those levels are gone forever because the conditions that
allowed them are gone forever.

What does all this have to do with concerns about Tree Swallows using bluebird boxes?  
These concerns are mostly based on unrealistic hopes and expectations that a
restoration to the bluebird population levels of the 1800's is possible, and that the
bluebird needs to be "saved."  But as we've seen,
far from being a species in peril
Eastern Bluebirds are actually doing extremely well today compared to most birds
,
aided by their toughness, their devoted followers, new habitat, and the growing
popularity of year-round supplemental feeding.  Bluebirds are among the lucky few bird
species whose future seems assured.  Bluebird hobbyists must recognize that bluebirds
never were and never are going to become truly abundant, and that having bluebird
boxes occupied by Tree Swallows or other native species does not in any way threaten
bluebirds' existence.  Rather, it's our own species' activities, for better or worse, that
will determine the population swings of bluebirds, swallows, and most other species on
earth, at least in the short run.




























TEST YOURSELF: Click HERE for an EASTERN BLUEBIRD - TREE SWALLOW QUIZ








                                                                 Top
Learn About Birds at Tree Swallow Nest Box Projects
Bluebird Competition
NO